tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8754356721889145004.post1194685248363632044..comments2024-03-25T19:54:31.172-04:00Comments on Relatively Geeky Network: RGP #037 - Doom 2099 22 & 23Relatively Geekyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08214808049768090936noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8754356721889145004.post-898993255674683242022-01-25T08:40:11.558-05:002022-01-25T08:40:11.558-05:00mind blown.
Yes, I thought about going into the i...mind blown.<br /><br />Yes, I thought about going into the imprinting vs. clone distinction, but that way lies madness. Relatively Geekyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08214808049768090936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8754356721889145004.post-88001004012060331932022-01-24T12:50:10.349-05:002022-01-24T12:50:10.349-05:00Thanks for covering as I have been following the &...Thanks for covering as I have been following the 'who is REALLY Doom' mystery from afar.<br /><br />Your breakdown of the 2x2 square is interesting. But may I ask a followup question.<br /><br />What does it truly mean when you ask 'who is Doom?' <br />If neither are the 20th Century Victor but one is a clone, is neither Doom?<br />What if one is a clone and one is someone who is a simulacrum imprinted with Doom's mental patterns? Are neither Doom? Or Both?<br />What if both are clones? Are neither Doom? Or both?<br /><br />I am going to guess that neither are truly the Doom alive and well in the 1980s. One is a clone. One is imprinted. And then the philosophical question of 'Who is Doom?' will get downright metaphysical!Anjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10023193805914075078noreply@blogger.com